The Case Of The Dangerous Golden Retriever

I do not practice criminal law, but I was happy to take the case of a three-year old golden retriever I’ll call Rex who was accused of ambushing an older couple and savagely attacking their Jack Russell terrier.  I’ve mentioned in previous blogs that I am the son of veterinarians and have grown up around and worked with a variety of breeds.  I’ve also handled several civil dog bite cases for human victims.  This was the first time I had ever heard of a golden retriever attacking anything other than its supper dish. 

My client explained to me that, in a moment of haste, she apparently did not fasten the latch to the fence that enclosed the backyard where Rex and his female companion, Sophie, stayed in nice weather.  She did not know they had left the backyard until a police officer arrived at her door.  The complaining couple, neighbors who lived just down the road, were the only witnesses to the alleged attack.  In the statement I obtained from the investigating detective, the couple alleged that Sophie approached them alone from the front and they verbally shooed her away.  They claim Rex jumped them from behind knocking both of them to the ground.  He then went after the Jack Russell.  The neighbors had bruised knees and a puncture wound on the Jack Russell to corroborate their story.  After completing his investigation, the detective initially indicated he would charge my client only with failing to confine Rex to her property.  However, the neighbors wanted my client to be cited for harboring a “dangerous dog,” and so she was. 

Under Pennsylvania’s Dog Law, a dog may be judicially labeled dangerous if it severely injures another animal without provocation(defined as broken bones or an injury requiring multiple stitches), attacks a human without provocation(whether causing injury or not), or has been used in the commission of a crime.  If a dog is found to be dangerous, the consequences can be quite costly to the owner.  There is the initial fine of not less than $500.00.  More burdensome are the requirements of constructing a special enclosure for the dog on the owner’s premises with a concrete slab, chain link fencing, and a locking gate, and notification to one’s insurance company.  The cost of constructing such an enclosure and the increase in insurance premiums often lead many owners to choose euthanizing the dog instead.  Not surprisingly, my client was quite upset over the possibility of having to make a choice between thousands of extra dollars she doesn’t have to spend and Rex’ life.

Optimistically believing that no one could find a golden retriever dangerous, she represented herself and Rex in front of the local magistrate and lost.  She appealed the citation to the county Court of Common Pleas and then called me.  Rex and his companion’s inability to testify gave us a decided disadvantage.  (Dr. Doolittle was not available to serve as an expert witness).  Nevertheless, since a conviction under the Dog Law requires the same “beyond a reasonable doubt” burden of proof required in any criminal case, I was confident I could create doubt in the judge’s mind as to whether an attack actually occurred.  I believe Rex and Sophie, seeing the neighbors and their dog coming up the road, simply went to say hello.  I’d bet money the Jack Russell went after Rex or Sophie starting the fracas.  Jack Russells are an entertaining and athletic breed, but can have a serious attitude problem especially towards other dogs.  My client told me a few weeks earlier the same Jack Russell had nearly choked itself trying to get off its leash and after Rex and Sophie as they walked by their neighbors’ home.  I’d bet more money the couple fell over the fighting dogs or got tangled up in the Jack Russell’s leash.

Fortunately, I did not have to convince a judge of Rex’ innocence.  The young assistant district attorney assigned to prosecute Rex also had not encountered anything worse than wet kisses from a golden retriever and agreed to a single charge of failure to confine a dog to one’s property, a fine of $25.00, and payment of the Jack Russell’s veterinary bills, which my client offered the neighbor anyway before any charges were filed. 

Dog bite cases have serious consequences for owners and victims.  While owners must be responsible for controlling their pets, at the same time a dog should not be put in jeopardy of losing its life without proof beyond a reasonable doubt that the dog is a menace.

This entry was posted in Personal Injury. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>